Saturday, June 13

The hidden "story facts," in the Denise VS. Don case - Revisited.

Tuesday, January-25-2011     (Revisited)

Thursday, December-16-10   (Oringinal date of writing)

To: Vic
Copy To: Serge
Subject: The hidden "story facts," in the Denise VS. Don case, are within reach for your thought processes.
It is 4:42 AM and I have been awake for the last 20 minutes. I awoke from a sleep with a new knowledge set of information for you in particular.

When you see a loose story thread, I know you follow it like a bull dog with a passion for a kill.
  1. You have realized that Denise fraudulently obtained exclusive ownership of my home.
  2. This was done by a series of Court Orders(Not Court Judgements) which were engineered and manufactured by the lawyers and inserted in the court files over a period of months.
  3. These inserted engineered corrections, produced her story that she was the exclusive owner of my home. I am the owner of that building, 6 Hazel Drive, Dollard-Des-Ormeaux; this is the only truth.
  4. This could only be done if both my lawyer and hers were in agreement to do so.(Conspired)
  5. When I visited the court records and digitally photographed them, (with the help of Brar who came to court with me) then these illegal engineered corrections were there for me to closely examine them later in my computer.
  6. These documents are now in my lap top computer and on a separate back-up hard drive. Some have been printed out and are in a loose-leaf binder on my book shelf in my apartment.
  7. These few illegal changes to the court records support the untrue story which the lawyers have used to move the case along to point that we are in today.
  8. At this point, Denise has (using ReMax Brokers) has moved out and sold the home to a couple, who are aware that something is not correct. The woman told me she was only following the broker’s instructions.
  9. Now the Notaries enter the picture, and they know the home cannot be transferred because of the combination of the Deed of Sale and the Marriage Contract.
  10. Now if I just fade away, the new occupants can stay in the home, but they cannot hypothecate it.
  11. Now then this will remain as it is until who knows when.
  12. Another lawyer would have to find the hole in the case, which they could legally peruse. This is highly unlikely.
  13. Or a criminal case would have to be pursued, which is also highly unlikely.
  14. Now if the above scenario (characterization) is typical of how many other divorce cases are getting through the courts and creating victims such as me, then we may have a movie or a case for television news.
  15. And finally I think I have created a summary for you, my lifelong friend and companion.
  16. This summary is the “Loose Story Thread” which the bull dog in you can work on with a passion.
  17. Please help me to get this message out to an audience that cares enough; can-do people.
  18. Use the INN JUSTICE web site, as a starting point for getting justice for all the victims out there
For the need to keep this message simple and clear I end here it is now 5:40 AM.