My Mothers Sweetheart

My Mothers Sweetheart

 

 

Open in another Tab

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Dowding,_1st_Baron_Dowding

Dowding system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This illustration shows the Dowding reporting chain for a highlighted Sector. ROC reports flow back through the Sector controls to FCHQ; it does not show the radars. Information flows back from FCHQ to Group, between groups, and down to Sectors, and then to the defences.

The Dowding system was the world's first wide-area ground-controlled interception network,^[1][a] controlling the airspace across the UK from northern Scotland to the southern coast of England. It used a complex dedicated buried land-line telephone network to rapidly collect information from Chain Home (CH) radar stations and the Royal Observer Corps (ROC) to direct defensive interceptor aircraft and anti-aircraft artillery. The system was built by the Royal Air Force just before the start of World War II, and proved decisive in the Battle of Britain.
The Dowding system was developed after tests demonstrated problems relaying information to the fighters before it was out of date. Air Chief Marshal Hugh Dowding, commander of RAF Fighter Command, solved the problem through the use of hierarchical reporting chains. Information was sent to Fighter Command Headquarters (FCHQ) central filter room at Bentley Priory and used to prepare a map of the battle. Details of the map were then relayed to the Group and Sector headquarters, where operators re-created the map at a scale covering their area of operations. Looking at the maps, commanders could make decisions on how to employ their forces quickly and without clutter. Instructions were relayed to the pilots only from the squadron's sector control rooms, normally co-located at the fighter's operating bases.
The Dowding system is considered key to the success of the RAF against the German air force (Luftwaffe) during the Battle of Britain. The combination of early detection and rapid dissemination of that information acted as a force multiplier, allowing the fighter force to be used at extremely high rates of effectiveness. In the pre-war period, interception rates of 30% to 50% were considered excellent; that meant that over half the sorties sent out would return without having encountered the enemy. During the Battle, average rates were well over 80%, and several raids were met with 100% success rates.^[2] Lacking their own direction system, Luftwaffe fighters had little information on the location of their RAF counterparts, and often returned to base having never seen them. When they did, the RAF fighters were almost always in an advantageous position.
Although many histories of the Battle of Britain comment on the role of radar, it was only in conjunction with the Dowding system that radar could be truly effective. This was not lost on Winston Churchill, who noted that:

All the ascendancy of the Hurricanes and Spitfires would have been fruitless but for this system which had been devised and built before the war. It had been shaped and refined in constant action, and all was now fused together into a most elaborate instrument of war, the like of which existed nowhere in the world.^[3]

My Father - The truth is out and it will never die.

He used my Mom to have two more sons. She confessed to me;
both "Bastards" ~ accidental.

I became the second lieutenant.

www.google.com/+donwesley


Doug a corporal.
Mom was a very secret woman with a 'scarlet secret.'



Some men are self made Bastards
I know One; a Very nosy human.

A spiritualist who believed in reincarnation.

 

A Letter between friends about ABUSE

www.google.com/+donwesley
http://innjustice.blogspot.ca/

Dear Vic ------------ Brar is my sons age (not a senior) and he saved my life as you did mine (Ormstown.) He is truly a very remarkable human being who, suffers a tragic set of illnesses concurrently; diabetes and Bi-polar disorder. He is truly brilliant and fearless. I could not have survived sleeping in my car (in sub zero weather - Ottawa Jan 2010). He and Herb Foxwell saved my life; I was prepared to die by freezing to death in my car. I had made up my mind. No one else truly cared enough to help, not even my own sons and wife. Canada does not take care of all the homeless. Thanks a gigabuck, Don

Proof Positive - Reincarnation

www.google.com/+donwesley


http://innjustice.blogspot.ca/



("I think you have actually been mistreated by your lawyers.")

Today, is November 12, 2014, and I just checked my blog stats, to see what has been read by anyone this afternoon.
This titled one,  -- "BE warned,after filing a complaint, your lawyer may be hostile towards you." appeared."

I had just posted at noon today - "A Victim - are you or have you been, someone's Victim?"

The following email from [blank] was from a young woman who was at the University of Ottawa. She had worked for her mother who is a lawyer. [Blank], wrote me this email to help me. We lived in the same apartment building in Ottawa. Her email gave me a little hope. I replaced her name to read [blank] at her request. She said---

 

 ("I think you have actually been mistreated by your lawyers.")

---------------------------------------------------------

A  Logical CONVERSATION ABOUT MY DIVORCE CASE

From: [Blank]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 8:41 PM
To: donwesley1933@live.com
Subject: Discussion

Hi Don,

We met in [Blank] . As promised I am sending an email to highlight what we talked about. Please, just let me say again, the advice I am giving you should not be considered "legal". My knowledge of the law is anecdotal at  best (and then only with regards to [Blank]) and since I am not a lawyer nor have ever attend law school, I am not qualified to dispense advice of that type. The advice is mostly what I would do in this case and logical assumptions from what you have told me.

If what you said in person, and what you have written on the blog is correct, then I think you have actually been mistreated by your lawyers.

I would recommend writing to your lawyer and seeing if you can get a copy of your file as it stands now. Make sure to keep a copy of the letter and the receipt from the post office. Also make sure to include in your letter that you would like a response from him no later than ______.

Set the date for two weeks from a reasonable time for him to have received the letter. If you get a favourable response, then hopefully you will get your files quickly and you can work from there. If he says he refuses to give you the files and does not offer a reason, then you keep that letter. If he says he will give you the files after you settle your account, then do your best to settle the account and

then request the letters again. (do not use cash, check or money order only and keep a photocopy of everything)
If after you have paid the account, he refuses to give you the files, then you move on to step 2.

Contact the Law Association, or the related body in [Blank]. File a complaint with them stating that the lawyer proceeded in the matter with no input from you, without you being aware of any court dates and/or without your presence at any of these dates. They are only concerned with his professional conduct. If you have proof that documents were tampered with at the court level, (ie the pictures you mentioned) you can include those but avoid mentions of conspiracies, rather mention that you were not consulted about any of the facts put forth by your attorney.

(On an unrelated note, I am amazed he was able to do anything without you there, considering how many of those documents require your signature.)

BE warned, after filing a complaint, your old lawyer may be hostile towards you, however, you should also notify him prior to this, in writing, that you are giving him legal notice that you are withdrawing him as your attorney. Now here you may come into a little problem. The court has to know at all times who your representation is. Once you do this, you will have to file a motion of change of representation. You should be able to find the forms online and fill them out. You will now be in charge of your case.

You mentioned you had some advice from some professors, this would be a good time to get their advice on how to proceed.

At this time, if you have proof that you have lost money due to your wife's actions, slander, etc. You might have a civil case. You would need to consult with a civil litigator to see if you have a case. You might have to pay a consultation for your first appointment, this is normal. It is the cost of a first appointment. Just because you meet with him and pay his initial appointment fee does not mean he is obligated to represent you, but it does mean he will take a look at your case, get an idea of its viability, and this would be time to discuss working on a contingency basis or getting one of those legal loans for civil cases. From this point, a lawyer would be better able to advise you if you have a case.

On a secondary note, if after all this you find yourself in the same situation, no money and no legal representation. You might want to consider settling with your wife, if only to have the whole process over and done with, and to allow yourself to concentrate on getting media attention on your situation. As someone who has worked in both these industries let me warn you, any mention of [Blank],   etc. will get you [Blank].

I hope this helps. Once you get your files from your lawyer, I might be able to read them over and give you an opinion.
Sincerely [Blank]
[Blank]

____________________________________________________________________________

From: donwesley1933@live.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 9:54 AM
To: [Blank]
Subject: Re: Discussion

Dear [Blank]
Meeting you and [Blank] is a great experience for me; thank you so very much.
I am pleased that you have visited my blog and I am happy to see your conclusions. ("I think you have actually been mistreated by your lawyers.")

I will get back to you very soon.
Love to both of you
Don _____________________________________________________________________________

www.google.com/+donwesley