Motor Vehicle Collision Report February 15, 2015

 



www.google.com/+donwesley


Motor Vehicle Collision Report February 15, 2015

Take note of the written number ~ 15097963

 

 

 

1. The subject - "The OPP Collision Report of 15 February" 2015 ?
2. When I called 911, on the 16th and they connected me to the OPP operator, she said this was the second accident to happen on Highway 43 near Chesterville, during the past hour ?
3. My own personal Collision....  happen between 0.1 and 0.2 kilometers, west of Queen Street in Chesterville. I looked east and west [my habit since I was 18 years old] and there were no cars in sight. I can see vehicles with lights on... at least (1) kilometer away on a dark night. I'm never ever in a hurry and I'm very prudent and a driver who leaves a lot of bubble space  between speeding vehicles; I'm hyper vigilant all the time and I prefer to drive at night when there is very little traffic, but maybe a few distracted drivers.
4. The Collision was "not" at Smith Road, (1.8) kilometers west of Queen Street.
5. The date for my Collision was the 16th, in the morning hour around 1:00 AM.
6. I was at home on the 15th  at 11:30 PM, contrary to the Police Collision report.
7. I called 911.... Some time around 1:00 AM  at Tim Hortons . There were 2 employees there who know me, very well ~ witnesses.
8. The Collision [into my rear Bumper] happened minutes after 12:45 AM on the 16th.
9. While at Tim Hortons. Sargent Sylvain Laducer Badge,  No: 9122 returned my call at 1:00 AM  - 16 February 2015....  to say no units were available. His message was saved on my TELUS Cell Phone.
10. I have all my meals at Tim Hortons..... every night, past midnight: and I was driving back home sometime after 2:00 AM  February 16, 2015.
11. On my way back home I stopped at the intersection of 43 and Queen Street, and I found some shattered plastic parts that were from another vehicle.  I took pictures.
12. I gave these parts to a female OPP officer on the 17th, and she said they were from a Chevrolet. She came out to see my vehicle I took these parts from passenger front seat.
13. My vehicle is a Chrysler PT Cruiser, and the Vehicle identified in the Collision report I was given, by the Male Officer on the afternoon of the 16th is a Dodge?
14. The date is the 15th at 11:30 PM. And where it happen was Smith Road, according to the collision report I received. I'm still waiting  for the collision I was involved in!
15. Not one OPP Unit,was available for my accident on the morning of the 16th!
16. The man who came to my car door and asked how I was; got back into his vehicle and left the scene of the accident. He was angry or pissed off about something.
17. The male OPP constable who delivered the Collision Report of the 15th said "This man has been charged with leaving the scene of the accident ?
18. I never drink, smoke or take any chemicals at all. I work all night and sleep during the day for several years.
19. I'll be 82 next month and have never caused an accident since I started  driving at the age of 14, in Montreal, where I was Born.
20. At 18, I became a Military Officer and one night in 1952 January 5, I was hit by vehicle and projected over 30 feet and landed on my face and survived the hit by a Drunk driver.
21. The vehicle that did hit my vehicle, on 16 February 2015, had a clear access to the passing lane. There were no other vehicles in sight.
22. Given that I was still reading my emails until at 12:11 AM, on the 16th.... I could not be on Highway 43 at 11:30 PM on the 15th.
23. So, is the Collision report False and the Traffic Summons wrong also ? This alone as triggered my PTS symptoms; an injury given to me by someone. {The Officer?}
24. Don Wesley 1933
25. I was reading my emails that I just  received,
26. as the Microsoft One-Note picture above reveals.
27. I was not where they indicate in the OPP Collision report.

 

 

 

Embezzlement

Embezzlement
From Wikipedia.

Jump to: navigation, search

"Embezzler" redirects here. For other uses, see The Embezzler.

"Peculate" redirects here. For the band, see Peculate (band).

"Peculator" redirects here. For the genus, see Peculator (gastropod).

Criminal law
Part of the common law series
Element (criminal law)
Actus reus Mens rea Causation Concurrence
Scope of criminal liability
Complicity Corporate Vicarious
Seriousness of offense
Felony Misdemeanor
Inchoate offenses
Attempt Conspiracy Incitement Solicitation
Offence against the person
Assault Battery Criminal negligence False imprisonment Kidnapping Mayhem Robbery Sexual assault Homicide Murder Felony murder Manslaughter Negligent homicide Vehicular homicide
Crimes against property
Arson Blackmail Burglary Embezzlement Extortion False pretenses Fraud Larceny Possessing stolen property Robbery Theft
Crimes against justice
Compounding Misprision Obstruction Perjury Malfeasance in office Perverting the course of justice
Defences to liability
Automatism Consent Defence of property Diminished responsibility Duress Entrapment Ignorantia juris non excusat Infancy Insanity Justification Mistake (of law) Necessity Provocation Self-defence
Other common law areas
Contracts Evidence Property Torts Wills, trusts and estates
Portals
Criminal justice Law
v t e

Embezzlement is the act of dishonestly withholding assets for the purpose of conversion (theft) of such assets by one or more individuals to whom such assets have been entrusted, to be held and/or used for other purposes.^[1]
Embezzlement is a kind of financial fraud. For instance, a lawyer could embezzle funds from clients' trust accounts, a financial advisor could embezzle funds from investors, or a person could embezzle funds from his or her spouse. Embezzlement may range from the very minor in nature, involving only small amounts, to the immense, involving large sums and sophisticated schemes.
More often than not^{[citation needed]}, embezzlement is performed in a manner that is premeditated, systematic and/or methodical, with the explicit intent to conceal the activities from other individuals, usually because it is being done (by the perpetrator) without the other individuals' knowledge or consent. Often it involves the trusted individual embezzling only a small proportion or fraction of the total of the funds or resources he/she receives or controls; in an attempt to minimize the risk of the detection of the misallocation of the funds or resources. When successful, embezzlements continue for years (or even decades) without detection. It is often only when a relatively large proportion of the funds are needed at one time; or they are called upon for another use; or, when a major institutional reorganization (the closing or moving of a plant or business office, or a merger/acquisition of a firm) requires the complete and independent accounting of all real and liquid assets; prior to, or concurrent with, the reorganization, that the victims realize the funds, savings, assets or other resources, are missing and that they have been duped by the embezzler.
In America, embezzlement is a statutory offense so the definition of the crime varies from statute to statute. Typical elements are (1) the fraudulent (2) conversion (3) of the property (4) of another (5) by a person who has lawful possession of the property.^[2]

• Fraudulent: The requirement that the conversion be fraudulent means simply that the defendant wilfully and without claim of right or mistake converted the property to his or her own use.
• Conversion: Embezzlement is a crime against ownership; that is, the owner's right to control the disposition and use of the property.^[3] The conversion element requires a substantial interference with the true owner's property rights (unlike larceny, where the slightest movement of the property when accompanied by the intent to deprive one of the possession of the property permanently is sufficient).^[4]
• Property: Embezzlement statutes do not limit the scope of the crime to conversions of personal property. Statutes generally include conversion of tangible personal property, intangible personal property and choses in action. Real property is not typically included.
• Of another: A person cannot embezzle his own property.
• Lawful possession: The critical element is that the defendant must have been in lawful possession of the property at the time of the fraudulent conversion and not have mere custody of the property. If the defendant had lawful possession the crime is embezzlement. If the defendant merely had custody, the crime is larceny.^[5] Determining whether a particular person had lawful possession or mere custody is sometimes extremely difficult.

John Wesley Sermon: Thoughts on War and More

www.google.com/+donwesley 



 

 

 

 



Mind over matter - Christ before Lucifer...

Mind over matter - Christ before Lucifer...


God over mind, matter: close and next to Him are Christ then Lucifer.
We are free to choose,
Don't follow Human Organizations. Follow your intuition.
Meditate [Think unconsciously]  then Vote quickly:  letting no-one interfere with your gift from God alone.
Watch out and be very aware,  of extroverted narcissistic evil Bullies.

John.



We need strong men like John Wesley ....



Particle Physics is the study of manifested matter only.

Particle Physics is the study of manifested matter only; like Medical Doctors must only use to diagnose.


















Mental Matter exists also ?









We seem to have found less than 1 percent of the
manifested matter that many say exists, in the whole Universe. Mental Matter, is dark light which maybe pure energy.  Wonderfully free!
Manifested Mental thoughts are amazing to study.
People will love you, and want more Hugs. You only need about 8 good hugs every day.



In my mind we can talk to God. We call this Mental Physics or Meta Physics. Deeply meditate all 24 hours you have available; even when you drive. Just avoid those who love Lucifer. 


Talk to God .  Talk also to His Second Son Christ and carefully ignore his first Son Lucifer.
God even allows you to argue with Him ~ Read the Story of Job, part of the great Bible Story. I still have my copy of the Bible Story for Children.  I was born in 1933.  


My second Son Steven, a Doctor (Psychiatrist) looks beyond simple matter. The real matter, that matters; is in our collective mind.  Mind over Matter!
We need more evidence from the dark energy. Doctors like my Son Steven need;  a special lecturing- place in every Church: Ancient, new and even in every pyramid still alive and without evil.   Let Doctors follow the evidence 
Think about the money we will save.  


I love all of you,
Don Wesley 1933

Steven

 

Steven

 

Steven - Canada

 

His Mom ~ Denise Wesley

www.google.com/+donwesley


Every thought, word and picture are mine alone. You may use them for educational purposes only. Just add my Identity Picture you see at the top.